Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
LewPalmer
USA
3244 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 17:18:17
|
Many of the early cars had numeric designations such as 18/80 or 8/33. I believe the first number was the supposed horsepower rating, but what does the second number mean?
Lew Palmer PA1169, NA0651 |
|
Eric Taylor
France
157 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 19:15:19
|
The F1 Magna was also known as the 12/70 Magna. 12 was the RAC horse power rating, presumably the 70 was its maximum speed? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
LewPalmer
USA
3244 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 19:38:50
|
Eric, I'm aware of the horsepower, but in the case of the J2, certainly the 33 in 8/33 didn't mean its top speed was 33 MPH. Even mine did better than that.
Anyone else?
Lew Palmer PA1169, NA0651 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
BobH
United Kingdom
250 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 20:27:00
|
I understood that the first number is treasury horsepower and the second is actual brake horsepower. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
LewPalmer
USA
3244 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 21:06:20
|
Thanks, Bob. Had I done my homework, I would have eventually come to that conclusion. Brake horsepower it is!
Lew Palmer PA1169, NA0651 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
george
United Kingdom
862 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 21:23:17
|
70 bhp for an F1!!! Geoff |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Eric Taylor
France
157 Posts |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 22:14:24
|
37.2 bhp I believe, George! |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
KevinA
New Zealand
671 Posts |
Posted - 30/04/2023 : 00:04:23
|
Whilst some manufacturers used bhp as the second number, MG wasn't generally one of them.
The 18/80 was designated 18hp and 80mph, not 80bhp. It produced around 60bhp. The mark 3 version, the Tigress, was designated the 18/100 due to its targeted top speed of the magic ton.
Neither reached their speed targets unfortunately.
|
Edited by - KevinA on 30/04/2023 00:08:33 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
tonym
United Kingdom
653 Posts |
Posted - 30/04/2023 : 14:19:41
|
Eric
Doubt very much that it was a top speed designation
It wouldn't have done much for sales of the 14/28 !! |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
huw
United Kingdom
10 Posts |
Posted - 30/04/2023 : 15:23:44
|
Reading the above with interest. The only consistency is that there is inconsistency. The early Cowley based 4-cylinder models adopted the tax rating and the supposed engine power of the Morris chassis - the 14/28. As the two diverged, the MG adopted a more apt 14/40. The bigger six-cylinder used the supposed maximum speed in place of the actual engine power, with the Tigress adopting 18/100 i.e. 100mph. For the smaller MG Midgets and Magnas it could be presumed that the four cylinder Midget kept the convention laid down by the - also four cylinder - 14hp and the six cylinder Magna the convention laid down by the - also six cylinder - 18hp. I would like to know! The convention of naming in the UK pre-war was inconsistent - that most manufacturers adopted the RAC hp rating was based on customer need as opposed to any directive from above. From that point, each manufacturer decided based on what i suppose they consider was best for them - hp, speed, cylinders, or nothing at all. Post war and the flat tax rate made the RAC hp rating irrelevant, but some kept on going for a while anyway.
|
Edited by - huw on 30/04/2023 15:24:33 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|